My issues with lit mags and the submitting process.

The author expresses frustration with literary magazines that ask about the writer’s identity, such as being neurodivergent or queer, as a factor in publishing decisions. They argue that the quality of the writing should be the sole criterion, and that identity-based representation should not be used as a marketing tactic by magazines.

  • The author was asked if they were neurodivergent when submitting a poem, which they found annoying and irrelevant to the quality of their work.
  • They believe literary magazines are using identity-based representation as a marketing tactic rather than focusing on publishing good writing.
  • The author argues that queer and marginalized writers are not actually underrepresented in publishing, and that using identity as a criterion can lead writers to falsely claim identities just to get published.
📚 BookAddict’s Take: This speaks to the challenges indie authors face in getting their work recognized based solely on merit, without having to conform to identity-based publishing trends. Indie authors should focus on writing the best possible work and finding readers who appreciate it, rather than trying to game the system.

Source: Reddit r/publishing  | 
Read the full article →